Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"

[Bob]

Some people that sell out and go 180 degrees with their opinions can live with themselves. Others have trouble coping with what they have done. Money is certainly part of the equation in terms of dealing with the guilt. However, Judas got 30 silver pieces and he still ended up hanging himself. I too, have absolutely zero sympathy for Mack. He made his own bed and now he has to sleep in it.

[saracarter766]

my husband has said the same thing that you said bob.

[Pasquale DiFabrizio]

Jsnow915 wrote:I have corresponded with Gary Mack...he was somewhat abrasive in his answers,but hey,how would you react if you were being personally attacked,I know I wouldn't be so kind...from what I got from him is this...he thinks there is a conspiracy but only accepts tangible evidence of one...when I get a chance,I will post his responses.Jsnow915,I completely respect you opinion too. Please let us know what he thinks. He should just post here. Having said that, there is a joke waiting to happen here.What I wanted to write right off the bat was something along the lines of "Yeah, I have something "tangible" right here!!! LMAO

[katisha]

Jsnow915 wrote:I have corresponded with Gary Mack...he was somewhat abrasive in his answers,but hey,how would you react if you were being personally attacked,I know I wouldn't be so kind...from what I got from him is this...he thinks there is a conspiracy but only accepts tangible evidence of one...when I get a chance,I will post his responses.I'd be interested to hear what he has to say, Jsnow915, and good on you for contactng him.I do, however, find it hard to believe that Gary Mack accepts the SBT and the Warren Report as hard evidence for the Lone Nutter, yet won't accept that there is any hard evidence of a conspiracy, in spite of the hundreds of books and documents out there. Some of them may be a bit off the mark but there are also many well-documented resources.

[saracarter766]

ChristophMessner wrote:saracarter766 wrote:Bob i love how you tell it straight up. I like your way of telling straight up, too, Sara, whether you believe it or not.you know what your right to i don't believe you and sorry chris but i no longer can trust you or feel like i can trust you and that is all i'm saying. however it was very nice of you to say but chris you totally destroyed the trust i had in you. i give the middle finger to traitors like gary mack i just have a very extreme amount of hatred for him i just can't help it peeps but when i look up to and highly respect and admire people like gary mack and they end up turning the other way yes i am very angry at him for that i can't help it people.

[ChristophMessner]

saracarter766 wrote: you know what your right to i don't believe you and sorry chris but i no longer can trust you or feel like i can trust you and that is all i'm saying. however it was very nice of you to say but chris you totally destroyed the trust i had in you. It's because you judge people superficially and throw around verdicts like God. saracarter766 wrote: i give the middle finger to traitors like gary mack i just have a very extreme amount of hatred for him i just can't help it peeps but when i look up to and highly respect and admire people like gary mack and they end up turning the other way yes i am very angry at him for that i can't help it people. I feel the same almost (rather contempt than hatred), but rather think that pissing at his shinbone all the time is not the right and decent strategy to bring him back to the unbiased truthers (which he was in the beginning). It would be important to help him increasing his courage and taking his momentary face-and-money-losing (which would soon disappear I'm sure) for his change into promoting publicly what he REALLY believes in the JFK-case again.

[kenmurray]

Pasquale DiFabrizio wrote:Jsnow915 wrote:I have corresponded with Gary Mack...he was somewhat abrasive in his answers,but hey,how would you react if you were being personally attacked,I know I wouldn't be so kind...from what I got from him is this...he thinks there is a conspiracy but only accepts tangible evidence of one...when I get a chance,I will post his responses.Jsnow915,I completely respect you opinion too. Please let us know what he thinks. He should just post here. Having said that, there is a joke waiting to happen here.What I wanted to write right off the bat was something along the lines of "Yeah, I have something "tangible" right here!!! LMAO Pasquale, I dont think Mack will ever post here. Heck he doesn't in other forums. He hides and sends people messages

[Bob]

I've said all that I can say. I've tried to be a ref in all of this, which is ironically what I tried to do as a bouncer in an earlier time in my life. People still ask me about all the fights I was in as a bouncer. Yes...I was in a few...but I broke up a hell of a lot more fights than I was ever involved in. That being said...shake hands...and DON'T come out fighting.

[ChristophMessner]

Jesus said: "Love your enemies!"So Gary Mack shall be critizised but not ruled by mob's law.

[Pasquale DiFabrizio]

kenmurray wrote:Pasquale DiFabrizio wrote:Jsnow915 wrote:I have corresponded with Gary Mack...he was somewhat abrasive in his answers,but hey,how would you react if you were being personally attacked,I know I wouldn't be so kind...from what I got from him is this...he thinks there is a conspiracy but only accepts tangible evidence of one...when I get a chance,I will post his responses.Jsnow915,I completely respect you opinion too. Please let us know what he thinks. He should just post here. Having said that, there is a joke waiting to happen here.What I wanted to write right off the bat was something along the lines of "Yeah, I have something "tangible" right here!!! LMAO Pasquale, I dont think Mack will ever post here. Heck he doesn't in other forums. He hides and sends people messages Well, it must be a real pickle that he's in, eh? I mean, here he is putting out propaganda and disinformation and, like a politician, doing a dance individually or one-on-one with people and trying to dupe them. Here we are calling him Mack-the-Sack, and he has to respond by proxy! LOLI hope he's reading this: What is "hard evidence," and why, Mr. Mack, do you think there is no "hard evidence" of a conspiracy?