Page 5 of 13

Re: Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"

Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 2:12 pm
by Jsnow915
I think Kathy like conspiracybuff have the right to their opinion..give them time and let them defend it...I totally agree that Gary Mack seems to be swayed to proving the single bullet theory right..I saw the show also and there never was a shot taken from where the Grassy Knoll shot came from.....if you put into context that Oswald was there doing his job suppossedly for the FBI by infaltraiting the CIA and hanging out with Files collecting bullets,sure he's guilty in the conspiracy...but....you can't place him in the window at the time of the shooting or positively identify him as the shooter of Tibbit(who I think had a hand in it somewhere)....he may be guilty by association..but I dont think in a court of law he could be found guilty on circumstantional evidence.

Re: Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"

Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 3:44 pm
by saracarter766
Jsnow915 your absolutely right she does have a right to her opinion but she really ticks me off by the misled comment and other things she said.i'm just sick and tired of the lies and cover ups and i am also fed up with this lone nut assassin theory but the fact is i highly admired and respected gary mack but after the doc inside the target car that left me feeling he turned on me and others who had so much respect for him. we americans who are honest and decent tax payers and elect those into office should give us the whole truth and not this warren commision bs cause if it was'nt for us none of the elected officals would be where they are now. why do they keep lying to us why i ask them.

Re: Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"

Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 3:51 pm
by Jsnow915
Sara...this is how the BIG BOYS play...its a rude awakening if you truly believe in honesty and honor...it doesn't exist in politics...(wow...that last line sounds like a bumper sticker to me..."honesty and honor-it doesn't exist in Politics")

Re: Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"

Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 4:12 pm
by saracarter766
yeah i guess so. well anyways i'm outta here.

Re: Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"

Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 4:34 pm
by ThomZajac
Kathy,With all due respect, I simply have very little time for anyone in the field who claims there is 'no hard evidence' to support of a conspiracy to kill JFK. While that evidence may not be enough to convince absolutely everyone of a conspiracy, to state that no hard evidence exists is ridiculous. And unless Gary is one of the most clueless people on earth, it's dishonest as well.

Re: Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"

Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 5:07 pm
by kenmurray
'He is doing everything he can to keep this case alive" Yeah, Gary Mack is doing everything to keep the "official version" alive. He doesn't even have 'The Men Who Killed Kennedy" dvd in his gift shop and Mack was in the dvd. Too funny.

Re: Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"

Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 6:20 pm
by saracarter766
dankbaar wrote:Gary Mack is a Lone Nutter in disguise, a Warren Commission apologist, and Kathy is falling for it. He is also a provable liar. Wimand dude this is why i think so much of you wim your such an awesome guy wim.makes think of the almond joy commercial sometimes you feel like a nut sometimes you don't hahaha.

Re: Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"

Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 7:44 pm
by kenmurray
Hey Bob is Len Osanic the one that does the boycott museum stuff?

Re: Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"

Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 9:18 pm
by ChristophMessner
Who is paying Gary Mack?

Re: Gary Mack and his "hard evidence"

Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 9:48 pm
by Bob
kenmurray wrote:Hey Bob is Len Osanic the one that does the boycott museum stuff?Yes.