Key Witness: Jackie Kennedy

[ThomZajac]

tom jeffers wrote:there was glass partitions between the conneleys and the drivers. they are split in the middle and were photographed at the hospital if you look closely. look at the slow motion of the z film and watch only the conneleys and you can see them hit the windows and then their heads go down.My understanding is that there had once been glass in the partition but it had been removed YEARS prior to November 22, 1963, though the center piece framework (to support the removable roof) still remained. In the Zapruder film the Connally's were clearly thrown forward by the sudden braking of the car, but there was no glass to hit and their forward momentum simply took them that far.I'll bet you a beer there was no glass in that partition that day in Dallas.Thom

[tom jeffers]

i stand corrected. after re examining pictures, there appears to be two hand grips installed. i initially thought they were panels of glass. i am never to old to change my mind or learn something.Namaste'

[ThomZajac]

I was hoping for a beer...

[Pennyworth]

we will get back to this.I am still looking for information that I came across a long time ago that Jackie Kennedy was instructed not to mention a front shot.I don't know if this is info or dis-info Its a real search here .She wrote a historical journal that was sealed and is not to be opened up for a long time. I wonder if this (not to mention the front shot) was something that was logged in her journal

[Pennyworth]

OK,In response to someone's inquiry,There's over 60,000 articles to pour through to find the statement I once saw and remembered about someone telling Jackie Kennedy 'not to mention the front shot.'I will keep plugging on as I am curious also now.In the mean time I found this:When you look at the amount of eyewitness testimony regarding the right rear head wound, they all concur this part of Kennedy’s head was blasted out. even the violent backwards thrust of Kennedy’s body against the back seat testifies to a frontal assault and entrance wound. Jackie Kennedy said jack looked normal from the front, but she had trouble holding his head together. we now know why she made that statement.http://www.conspiracy-theories-hoax.com ... iracy.html

[kenmurray]

PP, has you seen this wacky theory about Jackie? Check this out:http://www.realityreviewed.com/JFK%20murder.htm

[Pennyworth]

Pennyworth wrote:OK,In response to someone's inquiry,There's over 60,000 articles to pour through to find the statement I once saw and remembered about someone telling Jackie Kennedy 'not to mention the front shot.'I will keep plugging on as I am curious also now.In the mean time I found this:When you look at the amount of eyewitness testimony regarding the right rear head wound, they all concur this part of Kennedy’s head was blasted out. even the violent backwards thrust of Kennedy’s body against the back seat testifies to a frontal assault and entrance wound. Jackie Kennedy said jack looked normal from the front, but she had trouble holding his head together. we now know why she made that statement.http://www.conspiracy-theories-hoax.com ... iracy.html I AM GETTING CLOSE From the above paragraph :"Jackie Kennedy said Jack looked normal from the front, but she had trouble holding his head together"Now she sort of twists the statement around for the Warren Commission:" I was trying to hold his hair on. From the front there was nothing --- I suppose there must have been. But from the back you could see, you know, you were trying to hold his hair on, and his skull on."http://www.jfklancer.com/LNE/jbkwc.htmlPP: This is the first article I came across with the Warren Commission on Jackie Kennedy'stestimony.please ignore the fact that it came from the Lancer. i feel the same way that Wim does about them

[Pennyworth]

kenmurray wrote:PP, has you seen this wacky theory about Jackie? Check this out:http://www.realityreviewed.com/JFK%20murder.htmtHIS IS AS ABOUT AS RIDICULOUS AS THAT FIRST ARTICLE POSTED UNDER the NWO thread that suggests that Yoko Ono had something to do with the demise of John lennon

[kenmurray]

Pennyworth wrote:kenmurray wrote:PP, has you seen this wacky theory about Jackie? Check this out:http://www.realityreviewed.com/JFK%20murder.htmtHIS IS AS ABOUT AS RIDICULOUS AS THAT FIRST ARTICLE POSTED UNDER the NWO thread that suggests that Yoko Ono had something to do with the demise of John lennon Yes pretty wacky and ridiculous indeed.

[Pennyworth]

Pennyworth wrote:Pennyworth wrote:OK,In response to someone's inquiry,There's over 60,000 articles to pour through to find the statement I once saw and remembered about someone telling Jackie Kennedy 'not to mention the front shot.'I will keep plugging on as I am curious also now.In the mean time I found this:When you look at the amount of eyewitness testimony regarding the right rear head wound, they all concur this part of Kennedy’s head was blasted out. even the violent backwards thrust of Kennedy’s body against the back seat testifies to a frontal assault and entrance wound. Jackie Kennedy said jack looked normal from the front, but she had trouble holding his head together. we now know why she made that statement.http://www.conspiracy-theories-hoax.com ... iracy.html I AM GETTING CLOSE From the above paragraph :"Jackie Kennedy said Jack looked normal from the front, but she had trouble holding his head together"Now she sort of twists the statement around for the Warren Commission:" I was trying to hold his hair on. From the front there was nothing --- I suppose there must have been. But from the back you could see, you know, you were trying to hold his hair on, and his skull on."http://www.jfklancer.com/LNE/jbkwc.htmlPP: This is the first article I came across with the Warren Commission on Jackie Kennedy'stestimony.please ignore the fact that it came from the Lancer. i feel the same way that Wim does about them I will be getting back to this. It would help if some of the other posters who are interested in this particular thread to help to locate the statement I saw.I believe it was on older print, and on one of those pages that can't to C&P'd...thats why I believe didn't copy it , to the best of my recollection. BUT I do remember seeing that sentence that Jackie was instructed not to say anything about the front shot. The sentence photographed in my mind.